Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.


Scholarly Publishing: Gold Open Access (Publisher provides access)

Open Access Publishing

Photo: PLOS Blogs

Open access holds the promise of making scholarly articles freely available to everyone, regardless of affiliation, on the internet. Digital access is free to users with the cost being borne by authors, their sponsors, the society, or the library, while peer review and proper attribution of authorship are unchanged. A variety of income models are currently in use to support open-access journals. Recently, a few institutions have signed a compact to cover costs when authors lack other funding.

View a list of University of Iowa faculty publications in Open Access journals.

Embargo Periods

Some journals are becoming Open Access after an embargo of 6-24 months. These journals generally do not have APCs and are instead funded by the subscription for the most recent issues. These are not fully open access titles, but the less current content becomes freely available.

Predatory Open Access Journals

Photo credit: Ho, Ho

While Open Access publishing has advantages for scholarly communities, the model also presents opportunities for exploitation and deceit. Organizations claiming to run peer-reviewed, open access publications are sometimes fronts operated to collect production fees from authors (APCs), publishing work with little or no review. Additionally, there is debate around what constitutes a predatory journal, and this lends an element of subjectivity to their classification. The links below are good resources but should not be considered authoritative. When consulting them, it is important to complement their information with your own scrutiny. For assistance with this, contact the subject specialist librarians for your academic field.

Aaron Swartz

Aaron Swartz was a programmer and open culture activist who played foundational roles in the development of RSS, the Creative Commons organization, and Reddit, among other projects. At the age of 26 he took his own life after facing years of prosecution by the federal government for downloading large amounts of material from the article database JSTOR in an allegedly illegal fashion. The Internet's Own Boy is a documentary about his rich life and legacy, which shaped the internet and the Open Access movement into what they are, and a good introduction to what is at stake in debates on topics such as net neutrality, online privacy, and digital piracy.

Gold Open Access Models

Diamond Open Access - Free for Author, Free to Read

Under this model, neither author, nor reader has to pay for access to the journal's content. The costs of publication are absorbed by the publisher. This article discusses some reasons why a publisher may choose this model. 

APC Funded Open Access - Author Pays for Access

When it comes to gold open access, the article processing charge (APC) model is the most common. Here, the publisher makes content free for readers, but passes along the costs of publication to authors in the form of APCs. Authors must pay this fee before their articles are published. APCs can range anywhere from under $500 to several thousand dollars, for publication in a big-name journal. As you can see in the chart below, UI authors receive APC discounts from some publishers. The Office of the Provost and University Libraries also funds an Open Access Fund that can help authors recoup APC costs. 

Hybrid Open Access - Combining Free and Fee

Bowing to some of the pressures of open access publishing, certain publishers have made some of their journal content free and open while shielding other articles behind the subscription fees (usually the author has the choice to pay for his/her article to be OA). While having access to some information is better than nothing, this model is a complex one to manage. It is a challenge to librarians and to the public to know what is free and what is not. An article on the subject, from a publisher’s point of view, is Open Access, yes! Open Excess, no! (Blood, 2004, 103(9):3257).

Publishers with paid options for open access can be found on SHERPA's website.

Transformative Agreements

Research libraries are increasingly entering into transformative agreements (sometimes called read-and-publish agreements) with academic publishers. Under this model, libraries pay publishers for access to a journal’s full content, as well as the right to make their researchers’ work open access, under a single contract and fee. This allows authors to publish OA without paying a fee themselves. Here are the transformative agreements that UI has contracted:



Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Any UI corresponding author can publish open access in ACM journals with no fee. The publisher’s website contains additional information.

Cambridge University Press

There will be no charge for UI corresponding authors who publish open access in CUP’s gold (40 titles) and hybrid journals (330 titles). See CUP’s announcement for more details.

Microbiology Society

Articles published in this society’s journals will be OA by default for UI corresponding authors.

PLOS Medicine and PLOS Biology

UI corresponding authors can publish in these two PLOS journals with no fee. PLOS’ announcement provides more detail.

Royal Society

No-fee OA publishing in the society’s nine journals for UI corresponding authors. Royal Society’s read and publish page contains more information.

APC Discounts for UI Authors

UI Libraries has also negotiated discounts on APCs with certain publishers. Here are the discount agreements we have on file:

Open Access in the Humanities

A sampling of open access publications in the humanities:

Open Access in the Social Sciences

A sampling of open access publications in the social sciences:

OA in the Sciences

A sampling of open access publications in the sciences: