Open Scholarship Toolkit
Preregistering Statistical Analysis Plans and Protocols
Unreported flexibility in data analysis can reduce the credibility of reported results and invalidate common tools of statistical inference. By submitting a detailed study protocol and statistical analysis plan to a public registry prior to conducting the work (i.e., preregistering with an analysis plan), the scientist makes a clearer distinction between planned hypothesis tests (i.e., confirmatory tests) and unplanned discovery research (i.e., screening or exploratory research). Preregistration of laboratory protocols— detailed descriptions of the methods used in the experiment, including equipment and reagents—is becoming more common and facilitates replicability. Preregistration is particularly important for studies that make an inferential claim from a sampled group or population, as well as studies that are reporting and testing hypotheses. After a project is completed, protocols and preregistration analysis plans can be used in conjunction with the final study and analysis by researchers seeking to replicate, reproduce, and build upon findings.
(From Developing a Toolkit for Fostering Open Science Practices: Proceedings of a Workshop which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0))
-
Systematic Search ProtocolsA protocol is recommended for any type of review, but is especially encouraged for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, or umbrella reviews. Learn more from this Hardin Library guide.
-
ClinicalTrials.govClinicalTrials.gov is a database of privately and publicly funded clinical studies conducted around the world.
-
OSF - Open Science FrameworkRegistrations create time stamped, read-only versions of a project. Use this to preregister a hypothesis and analysis plan, or keep a snapshot of work before peer review.
-
protocols.ioA secure platform for developing and sharing reproducible methods.
Open Software & Code
Research projects may generate code that is used as a means to run, analyze, or interpret research data. The ability to independently confirm results and conclusions is critical for evaluating scientific rigor and informing future research activities. To extract maximum value from research findings and available data, any code deployed to process these data must therefore be widely and freely available. Research findings are not fully open unless the tools necessary to understand and test them are also made available.
Research projects may also generate software that is the product of the project rather than the byproduct, a specified deliverable designed to perform a specific task. Making the underlying code for this type of research output open source can encourage collaboration, further development, community engagement, and enhanced return on funders’ investment.
(From Developing a Toolkit for Fostering Open Science Practices: Proceedings of a Workshop which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0))
-
Iowa Research Online This link opens in a new windowIowa Research Online (IRO) collects and showcases the innovative research, scholarship, and creative work produced by the University of Iowa’s talented faculty, students, and staff. Its purpose is to foster discovery and collaboration as well as demonstrate the impact of teaching and learning in Iowa and beyond.
-
Code OceanThe Code Ocean platform generates a standard, secure, and executable research package called a Capsule. The Code Ocean Capsule format is open, exportable, reproducible, and interoperable. Each capsule is versioned and contains code, data, environment, and the associated results.
-
GitHubHosting for open-source software development projects and code.
-
zenodoBuilt and developed by researchers, to ensure that everyone can join in Open Science.
- Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025 3:07 PM
- URL: https://guides.lib.uiowa.edu/open
- Print Page